EX.P./641/2015 on 31 December 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA.

Ext. Pet. No. 641 of 2015

Date of decision: 31st December, 2015.

Shri Ganga Ram

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and others …Respondents.

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting ?1

For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with M/s Romesh Verma, Anup Rattan, and V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate Generals. _________________________________________________ Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

Mr. Romesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General stated at the Bar that the petitioner has not filed the representation in terms of the direction contained in the judgment. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated at the Bar that the petitioner has filed the representation. Be it as it is. The petitioner is at liberty to file fresh representation alongwith the copy of the judgment made by this Court, within one week from today before the respondents. The respondents 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14415-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:10:48 :::CIS

- 2 - are directed to consider the same and make decision within six weeks thereafter.

2. It goes without saying that in case the decision goes against the petitioner, he is at liberty to question the same in accordance with law.

3. Accordingly, the Execution Petition is disposed of alongwith pending applications, if any. Dasti copy.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir)

Chief Justice.

December 31, 2015

(Sureshwar Thakur) (cm Thakur)

Judge. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14415-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:10:48 :::CIS