CWP/5104/2011 on 30 December 2016

1. CWP No. 5104 of 2011 Amrik Singh and Ors.

…...Petitioners.

Versus HPPCL and Ors

...Respondents

2. CWP No. 5113 of 2011 Hoshiar Singh and Anr.

…...Petitioners.

Versus HPPCL and Ors

...Respondents

3. CWP No. 5114 of 2011 Jiwa Ram and Ors.

…...Petitioners.

Versus HPPCL and Ors

...Respondents

4. CWP No. 5420 of 2011 Parjesh Kumar and Anr.

…...Petitioners.

Versus HPPCL and Ors.

...Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting1?

For the petitioners: Mr. Anil Thakur, Proxy Counsel.

For the respondents: Mr. Nitish Negi, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No. 1 and 2.

Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:10944 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:11:30 :::CIS

- 2 -

Mr. P.M. Negi, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ramesh Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State.

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel appearing for the parties fairly stated that the instant cases being service matter are required to be transferred to the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, Shimla, HP.

2. Accordingly, in view of the notification No. G.S.R.926 (E) dated 29.12.2014 and No. Per (AP-B)B(15)4/2015 dated 25.3.2015, the matter requires to be adjudicated under the provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985. As such, in view of Section 29 of the said Act, record be transmitted to the Registry of the H.P. State Administrative Tribunal, which now stands established.

3. Learned counsel for the parties undertake to communicate the order to their clients and appear before the Tribunal on 10.1.2017.

4. Registrar (Judicial) to take appropriate action.

30th December, 2016 ( Sandeep Sharma ), manjit

Judge. High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:10944 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:11:30 :::CIS