CWP/10616/2012 on 30 December 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CWP No.10616 of 2012

Decided on: 30th December, 2015

Sh. Neel Kanth .......Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others. ...Respondents.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the petitioner: Mr. Gaurav Thakur, Advocate vice Ms. Vidushi Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge(Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions submits that with the passage of time and subsequent development, such as the tenure of the Pradhans of Gram Panchayat elected previously is now over and fresh elections are being held, the writ petition has turned infructuous. The petition is accordingly dismissed as being turned infructuous so also pending application(s), if any.

(Dharam Chand Chaudhary) December 30th , 2015 Judge (shankar) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14322 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:11:36 :::CIS