Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/443/2016 on 29 December 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA SHIMLA SHIMLA SHIMLA
COPC No. COPC No. COPC No. COPC No. 443
of 2016 of 2016 of 2016
Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: 29.12.
29.12.
29.12. 29.12.201
Smt. Sangeeta Sharma & others
.…Petitioners
Versus Sh. R.D. Dhiman
…Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Jus The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Jus The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Jus The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. tice. tice. tice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Sandeep Sharma, Judge. , Judge. , Judge. , Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 ____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan, Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners stated at the Bar that the respondent has partly complied with the directions, contained in the judgment, dated 22.07.2014, passed by this Court in CWP 6352 of 2013, but has not released arrear in favour of the petitioners. His statement is taken on record.
2. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to dispose of this contempt petition by directing the respondent 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:10895-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:13:06 :::CIS
to comply with the directions, contained in the judgment, supra, in letter and spirit, within four weeks from today and report compliance before the Registrar (Judicial).
3. The Registry to convey the order to the respondent and also furnish copy of the same to the learned Counsel for the respondent.
4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of.
Copy dasti. dasti. dasti. dasti.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) ( Mansoor Ahmad Mir )
Chief Jus Chief Jus Chief Jus Chief Justice. tice. tice. tice.
December 29 December 29 December 29 December 29, 201 , 201 , 201 , 2016,
(Sandeep Sharma
Sandeep Sharma) ) ) ) ( hemlata)
Judge. Judge. Judge. Judge. High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:10895-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:13:06 :::CIS