Himachal Pradesh High Court

RSA/554/2008 on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

RSA No.554/2008

Date of order: December 29, 2016 Sh. Jagdish Kumar s/o late Sh. Sonam Ram

…..…Appellant/Plaintiff.

Versus

Sh. Lal Singh s/o late Sh.Sonam Ram deceased through his LRs Arun Kumar s/o Sh. Lal Singh and others. ..…Respondents/Defendants

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. S. Rana, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes

For appellant : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate

For respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate

P. S. Rana, J. (Oral) Compromised decree passed under order XXIII Rule 3 CPC 1908:

At this stage learned Advocates appearing on behalf of parties filed application under order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC pleading therein that present RSA be disposed of as per terms and conditions of compromise Ext.PA placed on record. Court perused the compromise carefully. Court is satisfied that lawful compromise has been executed inter se parties. Permission to compromise the case granted in the ends of justice. Statement(s) of appellant namely Jagdish Kumar and newly impleaded LRs namely Arun Kumar and Ajay Kumar of 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:10888 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:13:57 :::CIS

2 deceased respondent recorded and placed on record. In view of above stated facts compromise decree is passed as per terms and conditions of compromise Ext.PA placed on record. Compromise Ext.PA and statements of parties placed on record will form part and parcel of compromised decree sheet. Decree(s) passed by learned Trial Court and learned First Appellate Court modified accordingly as per terms and conditions of compromise Ext.PA and statements of parties. Learned Registrar (Judicial) is directed to prepare compromise decree forthwith in accordance with law. It is further held that independent title of any person in suit property not impleaded as co-party in present case will not be effected in any manner. Parties are left to bear their own costs. Files of learned Trial Court and learned First Appellate Court alongwith certified copy of compromised order and compromised decree sheet be sent back forthwith. RSA No.554/2008 is disposed of. Pending application(s) if any also disposed of.

December 29, 2016

(P. S. Rana), (rana)

Judge. High Court of H.P. 2016:HHC:10888 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 06:13:57 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead