Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/947/2012 on 31 December 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SHIMLA
CWP No. 947 of 2012
Decided on : 31.12.2014
Shri Surender Kumar Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
HPSEB & another
….Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner:
Mr. A.K Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents:
Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Advocate.
Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral)
Heard counsel. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the relief as ventilated in the writ petition is covered by the circular issued by the respondent comprised in Annexure R-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. If so, the respondents are directed to consider the meting out of relief to the petitioner in consonance with Annexure R-1 by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks. Petition stands disposed of, as also the pending applications, if any.
December 31, 2014.
( Sureshwar Thakur ), (priti)
Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11812 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 14:55:10 :::CIS