CWP/5734/2014 on 31 December 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 5734 of 2014 Decided on: 31.12.2014 Manjula Chaudhary.

….Petitioner

versus State of H.P. & others.

….Respondents. ___________________________________________________________

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.S. Rana, Judge. Whether approved for reporting or not?1 No For the petitioner: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikram Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sanjay Karol, Judge (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that petitioner shall approach the respondents, venting out her grievances and also making out her case under various policies, so framed by the State. As such, as prayed for, on this short ground alone, present petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents that as and when any request is received, same shall be considered in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a period of four weeks. Needless to 1 Whether local reporters of the newspapers are allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11831-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 14:55:31 :::CIS

2 add, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same which shall be communicated to the petitioner.

2. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol) Judge

31st December, 2014 (P.S. Rana) (kck)

Judge High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11831-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 14:55:31 :::CIS