Himachal Pradesh High Court

CRMMO/103/2014 on 31 December 2015

2014:HHC:11825

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr.MMO No. 103 of 2014.

Date of Decision : 31st December, 2014.

Het Ram

…..Petitioner.

Versus

State of H.P. and another

…..Respondents.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate. For respondent No.1: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Deputy Advocate General. For respondent No.2: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________________

Sureshwar Thakur, Judge (Oral)

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions received from his client seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Permission granted. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty granted to the petitioner to agitate all the points as raised in the instant petition during the course of the cross- examination of the prosecution witnesses.

(Sureshwar Thakur) 31st December, 2014

Judge. (jai) High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11825 ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 14:59:34 :::CIS

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead