Himachal Pradesh High Court
RP/142/2015 on 30 December 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RP No.142 of 2015
Decided on: 30.12.2015.
Nand Lal and others
……….Review Petitioners.
versus
State of H.P. and others
………..Respondents.
___________________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr.Devender Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Romesh Verma and Mr.V.S. Chauhan, Addl.A.Gs. ____________________________________________________________ Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J.
CMP(M) No.1769 of 2015:
This application has been moved by the applicants/review petitioners for condoning the delay of 22 days which has crept in, in filing the review petition.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing the review petition is condoned. The Application is disposed of accordingly. RP No.142 of 2015
3. Taken on Board. The Registry is directed to diarize the same. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14334-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 15:01:35 :::CIS
…2…
4. Mr.Romesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, stated that he has no objection in case the review petition is allowed by recording the title of the case in paragraph 1 of the judgment dated 13th October, 2015 passed in CWP No.985 of 2009, as “Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh”, instead of “Shankar Lal versus State of Himachal Pradesh”. His statement is taken on record.
5. In view of the above, the Review Petition is allowed and the judgment under review is corrected to the extent, as indicated above. This order shall form part of the judgment under review.
6. The Review Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir)
Chief Justice.
December 30, 2015. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (Tilak)
Judge. High Court of H.P. 2015:HHC:14334-DB ::: Downloaded on - 03/11/2026 15:01:35 :::CIS