Central Administrative Tribunal

ASHISH vs HOME AFFAIRS on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Hon’ble Mr

Hon’ble Dr.

Ashish (Rol

S/o Sh. Muk

District Bhi

(By Advoca

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Union of Ministry of

2. Delhi Pol Delhi Police Street Polic

3. Addl. Co Police Head

4. Staff Sele Block No-1 (By Advoca

CENTRAL ADMINISTRAT PRINCIPAL BENCH, N

O.A. No. 4358/2

This the 02nd Day of Nov . Manish Garg, Member (J) Anand S Khati, Member (A) ll No. 125260024889) aged arou kesh R/o Village Dhanana, PO. D iwani, Haryana-127031

ate: Ms. Esha Mazumdar)

Versus f India Through Secretary Home Home Affairs North Block New lice Through Commissioner of P e Headquarters Behind Parliame e Station, New Delhi 110001 mmissioner of Police, HQ-II Re dquarters Jai Singh Road New D ection Commission, Through Ch 2, CGO Complex Lodhi Road N ate: Mr. Varun Vats)

IVE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI

vember, 2026 und 21 years, Dhanana …. Applicant

w Delhi110001 Police ent cruitment, elhi-110001 hairman New Delhi 110003. ...Respondents SUR AJ BISH T SUR AJ BISH T

Item No. 09 (C-IV)

In Admin relief:- “A

B. ex

C (E w

D

E. de

2. H applica (Execu disqua minimu recorde 0.30 c respon recorde Learne measur cm. In Medica

ORDER (ORAL)

Hon’ble Dr. Anand S Khati, M

n the present Original Applicatio nistrative Act, 1985 the applican - A. Call for records of the case; . Quash and set aside the impugne xtent Applicant has been wrongly decl C. Direct Respondents to appoint the Executive) Male with all consequentia ith interest at GPF rates; D. Award costs of the proceedings, . Pass any other order/ relief/ direct eem fit and proper in the interests of ju Highlighting the facts of the ant submits that the applican utive) Male in Delhi Police lified on the ground that he um height requirement of 170 ed as 169.70 cm, falling short o cm. The applicant thereafter p ndents seeking re-measuremen ed as 169.80 cm, i.e., 0.20 cm ed counsel further submits tha red at Civil Hospital, Bhiwani, w n support of his submission, h al Certificate dated 19.10.2026,

Member (A) on, filed under Section 19 of the nt has prayed for the following ed decision dated 26.09.2026 to the lared unfit on account of height; e Applicant to the post of Constable l benefits including pay, seniority etc. tion(s) as this Hon'ble Tribunal may ustice in favour of the Applicant;” case, learned counsel for the nt appeared in the Constable Examination, 2025, but was did not meet the prescribed 0 cm. His height was initially of the prescribed requirement by preferred an appeal before the nt of his height, which was m below the prescribed height. at the applicant got his height where it was recorded as 170.40 he has placed reliance on the annexed as Annexure A-6. e g e e

y e e s d y y e s . t e SUR AJ BISH T SUR AJ BISH T

Item No. 09 (C-IV)

3. L the or wherei

4. M respon the pre

5. H record, respon afresh, the sub measur post o measur decide subject necess particip Test (P event therein other r compli of a co earned counsel for the applicant rder dated 13.10.2026 passed 2026, titled Dheeraj Kumar vs in similar relief was granted. Mr. Varun Vats, learned couns ndents. He seeks some time to esent matter. Having heard the parties and per , we are of the view that the end ndents are directed to get the he , strictly in accordance with the r bject and by following the sam ring the height of other candidat f Constable (Executive) Male. rement shall be conducted at a d by the respondents, as per th

t. Depending upon the outcome ary consequential action wit pation or otherwise in the Physic PE&MT) shall also be taken wi the applicant participates in t n, he shall be entitled to appointm requisite eligibility conditions. T ied with positively within three opy of this order. However, if th t has also drawn our attention to by this Tribunal in O.A. No.

s. Union of India and Others, sel, appears on behalf of the take appropriate instructions in rused the pleadings available on ds of justice would be met if the eight of the applicant measured rules and instructions governing me methodology as adopted for tes appearing for selection to the Ordered accordingly. The said an appropriate institution to be he rules and instructions on the e of the fresh measurement, the th respect to the applicant's cal Endurance and Measurement thin one week thereafter. In the the PE&MT and is successful ment, subject to fulfilment of all The aforesaid directions shall be weeks from the date of receipt he applicant is found to meet the o

, e n n e d g r e d e e e s t e l l e t e SUR AJ BISH T SUR AJ BISH T

prescri matter

6. T directio There

(Dr. A Memb

/sb/

ibed height criteria, the responde in accordance with law. he OA stands disposed of ag ons. Pending MAs, if any, also shall be no order as to costs. Anand S Khati) ber (A) / OA No. 4358/2026 ents shall proceed further in the gainst the background of these stands disposed of accordingly. (Manish Garg) Member (J) e e . SUR AJ BISH T SUR AJ BISH T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead