Central Administrative Tribunal

Sh Rahul Jain vs AICTE on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.57 (Court-4)

Hon

Sh. R

Ajit P

Hary

(By A

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. K C S G S

2. T K M

M

B (By A

Central Administrativ Principal Bench, N O.A. No. 1665/2 This the 30th day of Oct ’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Membe Rahul Jain, Aged About 42 Years, S Prasad Jain R/O 4103, Shukarpura, yana- 123401. Advocate: Mr. Saurabh Kumar)

Versus

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, T Commissioner, Kendriya Sangathan, (Under Ministry of Government of India), 18, Instituti Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, Ne 10016. The Assistant Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan Ministry of Education, Government 8, Institutional Area, Shaheed J Marg, New Delhi-110016.

3. The Principal, PM SHRI Bongaigaon Assam-783381.

Advocate: Mr. U N Singh, Mr. Var

O.A. No.1665/ ve Tribunal New Delhi ober, 2026 er (J) S/O Sh. , Rewari, ...Applicant Through its Vidyalaya Education, ional Area, ew Delhi- (Estt.2/3), n, (Under t of India), Jeet Singh KV New

...Respondent run Vats, Ms. Tanya Arora) /2025 SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT

Item No.57 (Court-4)

A submit at the p has b adjudic withdra

2. Le aforesa

3. In withou may be with la There s

/sb/

ORDER (ORAL) Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg At the outset, learned counsel for ts that the applicant has since be place of his choice of posting. A become infructuous, as noth cation. Learned counsel, ther aw the present O.A. earned counsel for the respon aid submission. n view of the above, the O.A. ut prejudice to the rights and cont e urged at an appropriate stage, aw. All pending M.A.s, if any, shall be no order as to costs. O.A. No.1665/ g, Member (J):- the applicant, on instructions, een transferred and has joined Accordingly, the present O.A. hing further survives for refore, seeks permission to ndents does not dispute the . is dismissed as withdrawn, tentions of either party, which if so required, in accordance shall also stand disposed of. (Manish Garg) Member (J) /2025 SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead