Central Administrative Tribunal

BALWAN SINGH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Hon

BALW

R/O H

OFFI

(By A

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Th Mukh New

2. De Zone

(By A

Central Administrativ Principal Bench, N O.A. No. 141/2 This the 30th day of O ’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Membe WAN SINGH S/O RAMPHAL AGED H.No.116 SAINI COLONY VILLAG ICE AUCHANDI DELHI-39 (POST:

Advocate: Mr. J S Mann) Versus he Commissioner (MCD) Dr. Shya herjee Civic Centre, Jawahar Lal N Delhi. 110002. eputy Chief Accountant (North DMC) e, 16 Rajpur Road, Delhi.54. Advocate: Ms. Sangita Rai)

O.A. No.141/2 ve Tribunal New Delhi ctober, 2026 er (J) D 64 YRS GE POST MI) ...Applicant ama Prasad Nehru Marg, ) Civil Line ...Respondents.

SUR AJ BIS HT SUR AJ BIS HT

Item No.45 (Court-4)

In of the prayed f “ be m b) fi pe de c) fi be re

2. Le the app counter details reproduc “5 Co hi

6. da

7. vid

8. ORDER (ORAL Hon’ble Mr. Manish Ga n the present Original Applicatio Administrative Tribunals Act, for the following reliefs: “a) To direct the respondents to re enefits etc. as per details furnish monthly pension. ) To direct the respondents to grant i it in respect of all delayed payments of ension from the date of due to till he etails furnished in ANNEXURE-A-1. ) Any other relief or direction which it and proper in view of the facts and c e granted/passed in favor of the espondents.” earned counsel for the applicant plicant has received certain pa affidavit filed on behalf of th of the payments, as stated in ced below:

5. That the applicant was the per orporation of Delhi as per record av is terminal benefits are as under: Payment of Commutation of Pensio ated 25.01.2024 vide RTGS to the app Payment of DCRG- Rs. 6,59,880/- a de RTGS to the applicant. Payment of Leave Encashment- Rs. 6.09.2020 vide cheque no. 101506 to t

L) arg, Member (J):- on, filed under Section 19 1985, the applicant has elease amount of retirement ed in ANNEXURE-A-1 and interest @ 18% or as deemed f retirement benefits including actual date of payment as per h this Hon'ble Tribunal deems circumstances of the case may applicant and against the t does not dispute the fact that ayments, as indicated in the he respondents. The relevant n the counter affidavit, are rmanent employees of Municipal ailable in this office, the details of on- Rs. 7,39,427/- already paid on plicant. already paid on dated 04.09.2024 4,39,920/- already paid on dated the applicant.

SUR AJ BIS HT SUR AJ BIS HT

Item No.45 (Court-4)

9. vid

RT

3. Le aforesai the gran

4. M respond made an

5. In already benefits the resp benefits in accor of receip the appl payment Tribuna decided

Payment of GPF- Rs. 11,05,258/- a de RTGS to the applicant.

0. Payment of GIS- Rs. 15,262/- alrea TGS to the applicant.

1. Payment of 7th CPC-50% Rs. 9.06.2024 vide RTGS and remaining 1,366/- already paid on dated 04.10.20 earned counsel for the applican d payments, the only issues tha nt of MACP arrears and bonus. Ms. Sangita Rai, learned counse ents, submits that all necessary nd no retirement dues remain pay n view of the above, since mos been released and the only survi and bonus, we dispose of the pr pondents to consider the applica and bonus, in accordance with rdance with law within a period pt of a certified copy of this ord licant shall also be entitled to ar ts, in terms of the ratio laid dow l in O.A. No. 2821/2023, titled R on 30.10.2025. This is particula already paid on dated 15.10.2020 ady paid on dated 24.08.2020 vide 21,366/- already paid on dated g payment of 7th CPC 50% Rs. 024 to the applicant.” nt submits that, in view of the at survive for adjudication are el appearing on behalf of the y payments have already been yable to the applicant. st of the retiral benefits have iving claims pertain to MACP resent O.A. with a direction to ant's case for grant of MACP h the applicable rules position of three months from the date der. Needless to mention that rrears and interest on delayed wn by the Full Bench of this Rajbir Singh v. MCD & Ors., arly so in view of the fact that

SUR AJ BIS HT SUR AJ BIS HT

Item No.45 (Court-4)

the appl benefits than fou

6. Th M.As., i no order

/sb/

licant superannuated on 30.06. were released only in the year ur years. he O.A. stands disposed of in if any, shall also stand disposed r as to costs.

O.A. No.141/2 2020, whereas certain retiral r 2024, after a delay of more the aforesaid terms. Pending of accordingly. There shall be (Manish Garg) Member (J)

SUR AJ BIS HT SUR AJ BIS HT

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead