Central Administrative Tribunal
Sh PANKAJ KUMAR vs KVS on 30 October 2026
Item No.58 (Court-4)
Pa
Central Admi
Principal B
O.A. N
This the 30th d
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Gar
Sh. Pankaj Kumar, S/o Sh. A
127/W/126 A-3, Usmanpur G
Uttar Pradesh-208014.
(By Advocate: Mr. Saurabh K
V
1. Kendriya Vidyalaya San
Commissioner,
Ken
Sangathan, (Under Min
Government of India), 1
Shaheed Jeet Singh M
110016.
2. The
Assistant
Comm
Kendriya
Vidyalaya
Ministry of Education, G
18, Institutional Area,
Marg, New Delhi-110016
3.
The
Principal,
K
Khanapara, Guwahati-78
(By Advocate: Mr. U N Sing
age 1 of 2
inistrative Tribunal
Bench, New Delhi
No. 1666/2025
day of October, 2026
g, Member (J)
Ashok Kumar, R/o
Gaon, Kanpur Nagar,
...Applicant
Kumar)
Versus
ngathan, Through its
ndriya
Vidyalaya
nistry of Education,
8, Institutional Area,
Marg, New Delhi-
missioner
(Estt.2/3),
Sangathan,
(Under
Government of India),
Shaheed Jeet Singh
6.
Kendriya
Vidyalaya
1022.
...Respond
gh, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj, Mr. K
O.A. No.1666/2025
dent
Kunal Vats)
SURAJ
BISHT
SURAJ
BISHT
Item No.58 (Court-4)
su
at
ha
ad
w
2.
af
3.
w
m
w
Th
/sb/
Pa
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Ma At the outset, learned co ubmits that the applicant ha t the place of his choice of as become infructuous, djudication. Learned coun withdraw the present O.A.
Learned counsel for t foresaid submission.
In view of the above, without prejudice to the right may be urged at an appropri with law. All pending M.A. here shall be no order as to
age 2 of 2 (ORAL) anish Garg, Member (J):- ounsel for the applicant, on as since been transferred an posting. Accordingly, the p as nothing further su nsel, therefore, seeks pe the respondents does not the O.A. is dismissed as ts and contentions of either iate stage, if so required, in .s, if any, shall also stand costs. (Man M O.A. No.1666/2025 instructions, nd has joined present O.A. urvives for ermission to dispute the s withdrawn, party, which n accordance disposed of. nish Garg) ember (J) SURAJ BISHT SURAJ BISHT