Central Administrative Tribunal

Amitabh Verma vs Department of Education (GNCTD) on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Central Administrative Tribunal

Principal Bench: New Delhi

O.A. No.4316/2026

This the 30th day of October, 2026

Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Amitabh Verma, ID No.20233810 S/o Shri H.L. Verma Aged about 60 years, R/o A-218, Sector-25 Rohini, Delhi-85 Retired TGT from GBSSS Pooth Kalan, School 1.D-1412007 (Sub: Pension/retiral dues) Group-'B'

…Applicant

(By Advocate: Mr. Ranjit Sharma)

Versus

1. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Through the Chief Secretary, Delhi Secretariat, New Delhi-02

2. Director of Education Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi Old Secretariat, Sham Nath Marg Delhi-54

3. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through the Commissioner S.P Mukherjee Civic Centre J.L.N Marg, New Delhi-02

4. Director of Education Municipal Corporation of Delhi S.P Mukherjee Civic Centre, J.L.N Marg, New Delhi-02

…Respondents

(By Advocates: Mr. H.A. Khan;

Ms. Filza Moonis)

SNEHA MEENA

ORDER (ORAL)

In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant seeks the following reliefs: “a. direct the respondents to release retiral dues of the applicant, namely gratuity, leave encashment, commuted amount of pension and pension on regular basis on his superannuation on 30-04-2026 from the services of the Education Department of GNCTD along with interests; AND

b. release the pension of the applicant on regular basis. AND/OR

b. pass such other order/s as may be deemed fit & proper.”

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant retired from service on 30.04.2026 and that his representation annexed at Annexure A1 Colly regarding grant of provisional pension and other retiral benefits is still pending consideration before the competent authority.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant would be satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation by passing an appropriate reasoned and speaking order within a stipulated time frame.

4. Issue notice. Mr. H.A.Khan and Ms. Filza Moonis, learned counsel appear and accept notice on behalf of SNEHA MEENA

the respondents. They seeks sometime to obtain appropriate instructions.

5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present OA is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the pending representation of the applicant by passing an appropriate reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The applicant's claim for grant of provisional pension and other retiral benefits shall also be considered by the competent authority, in accordance with the applicable rules, while passing the aforesaid order.

6. It is made clear that this Tribunal has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

7. The OA stands disposed of, at the admission stage itself. Pending MAs, if any, shall also stand disposed of. No order as to costs.

(Manish Garg) Member (J) /sm/ SNEHA MEENA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead