Central Administrative Tribunal
ANIL KUMAR TYAGI vs CISF on 28 October 2026
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
OA No. 4254/2026
This the 28th October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)
Hon’ble Mr. Rajveer Singh Verma, Member (J)
Anil Kumar Tyagi
S/o Late Shri Kanti Swaroop Tyagi,
Aged about 60 years, Group B,
R/o Near Idea Tower, Sonda Road,
Adarsh Nagar, Modinagar,
Ghaziabad, U.P. – 201204. ………..Applicant (By Advocate : Ms Amita Singh Kalkal)
VERSUS
Central Industrial Security Force (CISF)
Through its Director General,
13, CGO’s Complex, Lodhi Road,
New Delhi – 110003.
...Respondent
(By Advocate Mr Sushil Kumar Pandey with Mr Aman Kr Pandey)
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)
1. The applicant has filed the present Original Application seeking grant of higher pay for having officiated as Assistant Director (Accounts) in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) from 01.04.2025 to 28.02.2026, in terms of FR-35 and FR-49. PINKY YADAV PINKY YADAV
Page 1 of 3
2. The applicant submits that, after the retirement of the incumbent holding the post of Assistant Director (Accounts), he was directed to discharge the duties of the said post on an officiating basis, in addition to his existing duties as Accounts Officer. It is further submitted that, despite his representation dated 24.04.2026 seeking grant of officiating pay, followed by reminders dated 30.04.2026, 16.06.2026, 08.07.2026 and 07.08.2026, the respondents have not taken any decision thereon.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in not deciding his pending representation. Hence, the applicant has filed the present OA.
4. Heard.
5. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel who appears on advance service, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He seeks and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply to the OA.
6. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant will fairly satisfied if a direction is issued to PINKY YADAV PINKY YADAV
Page 2 of 3
the respondents to dispose of the pending representation of the applicant dated 24.04.2026 within a stipulated period.
7. In view of the limited relief sought at this stage, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the applicant, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present OA with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the applicant’s representation dated 24.04.2026, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with the applicable rules and instructions, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
8. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the applicant forthwith.
9. The OA stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
(Rajveer Singh Verma) (Chhabilendra Roul)
Member (J)
Member (A)
/pinky/
PINKY YADAV PINKY YADAV
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…