Central Administrative Tribunal
M S Hashmi vs MR. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH, SECRETARY, M/O DEFENCE AND OTHERS on 27 October 2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal Bench: New Delhi
C.P. No. 288/2026
In
O.A. No. 3133/2017
This the 27th day of October, 2026
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
Hon’ble Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, Member (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M. S. Hashmi Aged about 63 years, S/6 Sh, Abdul Mateen Hashmi, R/o C/o Imran Shamsi, H- 190 First Floor, Shamshul Road, Jaitpur Extension-2, Badarpur, New Delhi Post: Garrison Engineer (Naval Works) Group -A
…Petitioner
(By Advocate: Mr. Khowaja Siddiqui with Mr. Kshitij Arora)
Versus
1. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh The Secretary Union of India Ministry of Defence, Room No. 341-A, B Wing, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi-110011 Email: defsecy@nic.in
2. Lt Gen. Vikas Rohella Engineer in Chief Engineer-in-Chief's Branch, Kashmir House, Rajaji Marg, New Delhi-110011
3. Mr. Rachna Shah The Secretary Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension Department of Personnel & Training, North Block, New Delhi-110001 Email: secy mop@nic.in
…Respondents
(By Advocate: Mr. Ranjan Tyagi)
KSHITIJ SAXENA
ORDER (ORAL) Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
In the present CP, wilful defiance of the directions issued by this Tribunal vide common order/judgment dated 05.04.2021 passed in the captioned OA along with OA No. 1518/2020 is alleged. Paras 22 and 23 of the said common order read as under: “22. Therefore, the O.A. No. 3133/2017 is allowed, setting aside the charge memo dated 19.02.2014 and impugned proceedings dated 03.07.2017. The applicant shall be extended the benefits, which were denied to him, on account of pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, in accordance with law.
23. The O.A. No.1518/2020 is dismissed, leaving it open to the applicant to make a fresh application for voluntary retirement from service after reporting to duty.”
2. Mr. Tyagi, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that, in compliance with the directions issued by this Tribunal, the respondent has considered the applicant’s case for grant of consequential benefits relating to his placement in the NFSG in the grade of EE and promotion to the grade of Superintending Engineer in the Military Engineering Services. He invites our attention to the compliance affidavit filed on 26.10.2026, to which the relevant promotion order(s) have been annexed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner has received consequential promotion order(s).
KSHITIJ SAXENA
4. In light of the aforesaid, we find sufficient compliance with the directions issued by this Tribunal. Accordingly, the CP is closed. Notices are discharged. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to agitate his grievances, if any, in accordance with law.
(Sanjeeva Kumar) (R.N. Singh) Member (A) Member (J)
/ks/
KSHITIJ SAXENA