Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/9468/2014 on 30 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No. 9468 of 2014-G
Decided on: 30th December, 2014
Ravi Kumar
.....Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors.
...Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. S. Rana, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the petitioner : Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vikram Thakur, Dy.A.G.
Sanjay Karol, Judge (Oral)
It is seen that petitioner, who is working as Lecturer (English) at Govt. Sen. Sec. School, Dugli, Tehsil Churah, Distt. Chamba (H.P.), has completed his normal tenure of posting in hard/difficult/tribal area. He has indicated the stations of his choice where he can be posted in terms of the transfer policy. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-3) has been forwarded through proper channel to respondent No.2, which is still pending before the authority concerned.
2. Under instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the said respondent to decide the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-3) expeditiously. Mr. V. S. Chauhan, learned Addl. Advocate General has no objection to the same.
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11784-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:10:03 :::CIS
2
3. No other point is urged.
4. Leaving the questions of law open, a direction is issued to respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-3), in accordance with law, by affording due opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. Needless to add, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid observations, petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
Copy dasti.
(Sanjay Karol)
Judge
December 30, 2014
(P. S. Rana)
(rana)
Judge High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11784-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:10:03 :::CIS