Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/9513/2014 on 30 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 9467 of 2014 a/w CWPs No. 9512 to 9515/2014.
Date of decision: 30.12.2014.
CWP No.9467/2014 Pratap Chand
…..Petitioner
Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board and others
…Respondents CWP No.9512/2014 Kaman Singh and others
…..Petitioners
Versus State of HP and others
…Respondents CWP No.9513/2014 Banka Ram and others
…..Petitioners
Versus State of HP and others
…Respondents CWP No.9514/2014 Devi Chand and others
…..Petitioners
Versus State of HP and others
…Respondents CWP No.9515/2014 Devi Singh and others
…..Petitioners
Versus State of HP and others
…Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting ?1
For the petitioner(s): M/s Dushyant Dadhwal and Ashwani Pathak, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Romesh Verma & Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State in all the petitions.
Ms. Sharmila Patial, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2 in CWP No. 9467/2014.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)
Issue notice to the respondents in all the petitions. Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.
High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11788-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:10:09 :::CIS
- 2 - General waives notice on behalf of respondents-State in all the petitions and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Advocate waives the same on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP No. 9467 of 2014.
2. The dispute raised in these writ petitions is already determined by the apex Court in the judgment titled Raghubir Singh versus. General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Hissar, reported in 2014 AIR SCW 5515, and the same has been relied upon by the Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.6687 of 2014, decided on 24.9.2014. Thus, the issue involved in the present writ petitions is covered by the judgment rendered by the apex Court, supra read with the judgment rendered by this Court in CWP No.6687 of 2014.
3. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to quash the impugned order(s) in the writ petitions and direct the Labour Commissioner, H.P. to make references to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court within six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The writ petitions are disposed of, as indicated hereinabove, alongwith all pending applications, if any.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir )
Chief Justice.
December 30, 2014.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (cm Thakur)
Judge.
High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11788-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:10:09 :::CIS