Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/9731/2014 on 30 December 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No.9731 of 2014
Date of Decision: 30.12.2014
Nirmala Devi
………Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & others. …..Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice P.S. Rana, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1No.
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, AG., with M/s V.S. Chauhan, Addl. AG., and Vikram Thakur, Dy. AG., for the respondents-State.
Sanjay Karol, J (oral)
It is seen that petitioner has made a representation dated 24.06.2014 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.3, bringing out her grievances, which is still pending before the authority concerned.
2. Under instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondent/competent authority to decide representation dated 24.06.2014
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11797-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:10:33 :::CIS
2 (Annexure P-2) expeditiously. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to the same.
3. No other point is urged.
4. Leaving the questions of law open, a direction is issued to the respondent/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation dated 24.06.2014 (Annexure P-2), in accordance with law, by affording due opportunity of hearing/representation to the petitioner, within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the petitioner, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. Till then interim order dated 23.12.2014, shall remain in operation. With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.
(Sanjay Karol),
Judge.
(P.S. Rana), December 30, 2014 Judge.
(Purohit)
High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11797-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:10:33 :::CIS