CWP/9892/2014 on 30 December 2014

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

CWP No.9892/2014-J

Date of Decision: December 30, 2014 Virender Singh

.....Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

…Respondents

Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice P. S. Rana, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No

For the petitioner : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate

For the respondents : Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Vikram Thakur, Dy. A.G.

Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-9) within a period of four weeks from today.

2. As such, as prayed for, petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to decide the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-9), in the light of decision taken by the respondents (Annexure P-8) and judgment rendered by this Court in LPA No. 170 of 2014 titled as Balak Ram vs. State of H.P. & Ors., decided on 19.11.2014, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four weeks 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11799-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:11:21 :::CIS

2 from today, by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Order assigning reasons shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

3. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

Copy dasti.

(Sanjay Karol), Judge.

December 30, 2014

(P. S. Rana), (rana)

Judge. High Court of H.P. 2014:HHC:11799-DB ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 00:11:21 :::CIS