Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/32/2017 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.32 of 2017 Date of Decision: 03.11.2026 _______________________________________________________________________ Chet Ram
……...Petitioner Versus The Hon’ble High Court of H.P.
……...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge Whether approved for reporting? _______________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Surender Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent: Ms. Ranjana Sharma, Advocate. ____________________________________________________________________
Ajay Mohan Goel, J. (Oral)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs: “(i) That the impugned Annexure-PF, dated 2nd August, 2016, may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent whereby the petitioner has been promoted as Clerk in the pay band of Rs.5910- 20200+1900/- Grade Pay+Rs.400/- Secretariat Pay, instead of being promoted to the post of Junior Assistant/Senior Assistant;
(ii) That the Recruitment & Promotion Rules framed vide Annexure- PE, dated 3rd December, 2015, may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent, whereby the post of Telephone Operator/Receptionist have been made one of the feeder post for promotion to the post of Clerk against 25% transfer/promotion quota, or the necessary High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:57:23 :::CIS
-2- amendments in the R&P Rules may kindly be ordered to be carried out;
(iii) That the respondent may kindly be directed to promote the petitioner to the post of Junior Assistant with all consequential benefits;
(iv) That the respondent may kindly be directed to grant the pay band of Rs.10300-34800+3200/- Grade Pay+Rs.400/- Secretariat Pay to the petitioner; ”
2. The writ was filed in the year 2016. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that as, in the interregnum, the petitioner has gained other promotions also, these proceedings be closed, but with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities afresh with regard to a limited grievance, i.e. protection of the grade pay which the petitioner was drawing as a Telephone Operator consequent upon his promotion to the post of Clerk.
3. The petition is closed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel), Judge
(Yogesh Jaswal), Judge November 03, 2026 Rajeev Raturi High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:57:23 :::CIS