Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/19365/2026 on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.19365 of 2026

Decided on: 03.11.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Govind Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Limited and others

.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Shivank S. Panta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Notice. Mr. Digvijay Singh, learned vice counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:-

(i) That the directions may kindly be issued to the respondent Corporation to pay the amount of gratuity (DCRG) and Leave encashment alongwith interest @ 9% per annum to the petitioner with effect from due date i.e. 01.02.2026 till the date of its realization.”

3. The petitioner was in service of the respondent- Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation (HPTDC) Ltd. and retired as Commi-III on 31.01.2026 from

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:58:05 :::CIS

2

HPTDC Himachal Bhawan, New Delhi, after rendering more than 20 years of regular service. It is the case of the petitioner that the amount of gratuity of Rs.06,07,327/-and leave encashment of Rs.05,26,350/- have been sanctioned by the respondents, vide office orders dated 06.04.2026 (Annexure P-1colly). The grievance of the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid gratuity and leave encashment being sanctioned, the same have not been released. It is, however, submitted that an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- has been disbursed to the petitioner by the respondents on account of retiral benefits, i.e. gratuity.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to release the admissible retiral benefits along with statutory interest to the petitioner within a period of six months from today, in accordance with law. If the amount due is not paid within the aforesaid period, the same shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from due date of actual payment. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua 3rd November, 2026

Judge rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:58:05 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead