Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19449/2026 on 3 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 19449 & 19585/2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19449/2026
Aruna Diwan
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
2. CWP No. 19585/2026
Leela Devi
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Surya Prabha & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 5390/2024 decided on 28.05.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:58:32 :::CIS
2 and Ranjit Singh & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.3 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations, in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.
4. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
3rd November, 2026 rohit
3 CWP No. 2500/2021 decided on 07.07.2023 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:58:32 :::CIS