Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19452/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19452/2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rakesh Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Gitika, Advocate vice Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner’s seeks applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition.
3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:58:38 :::CIS
2 consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
3rd November, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:58:38 :::CIS