Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19527/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19527/2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Veena Kumari
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Adarsh Vashisht, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to count the service rendered by her as a part-time water carrier towards qualifying service for pension, so as to enable her to receive pension under the CCS Pension Rules, 1972. It appears that the petitioner has not preferred any representation to the respondents for redressal of her grievance.
2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be content if she is permitted to file a representation to respondent No. 2/Competent Authority,
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:59:08 :::CIS
2 with a direction to the said respondent/Competent Authority to decide the same within a time-bound schedule.
3. In view of above and without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file a representation to respondent No. 2/Competent Authority, in accordance with law within two weeks from today. In case such representation is so preferred, the same shall be considered and decided by the said respondent/Competent Authority within six weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. The decision so arrived at shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 3rd November, 2026
Judge rohit
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:59:08 :::CIS