Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19556/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19556/2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sukh Dev Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 06.06.2026 (Annexures P-1), seeking applicability of Madan Lal Vs. State of H.P. and Anr2. has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 3341/2019 decided on 04.09.2021 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:59:17 :::CIS
2 representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule.
4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge
3rd November, 2026 rohit High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 02:59:17 :::CIS