Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/19575/2026 on 3 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No. 19464/2026 a/w connected matters

Decided on: 03.11.2026

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CWP No. 19464/2026

Govind Singh

…..Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents

2. CWP No. 19476/2026

Meena Kumari

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Anr.

.....Respondents

3. CWP No. 19477/2026

Pankaj Kumar

…..Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. and Ors.

.....Respondents

4. CWP No. 19478/2026

Kamal Kishor

…Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

5. CWP No. 19564/2026

Poonam Kumari

…Petitioner

Versus State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

6. CWP No. 19567/2026

Santosh Devi

…Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

7. CWP No. 19574/2026

Kusum Lata & Ors.

…Petitioners

Versus State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

8. CWP No. 19575/2026

Sanjeev Kumar & Ors.

…Petitioners

Versus State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

9. CWP No. 19587/2026

Rupali & Ors.

…Petitioners

Versus State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

10. CWP No. 19588/2026

Pawan Kumar & Ors.

…Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

11. CWP No. 19657/2026

Apoorva Sharma & Anr.

…Petitioners

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coram

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1

For the Petitioners: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocates for the petitioners.

1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents in the respective petitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

Petitioners seek applicability of Ghanshyam Dass and Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2.

2. Learned Additional Advocate General has apprised that the aforesaid decision has been stayed under order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No.205 of 2025 and other connected matters.

3. In view of above position, the relief in the nature claimed by the petitioners cannot be granted to them at this stage. These writ petitions, therefore, are disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners within six weeks after the adjudication of LPA No.205 of 2025 and in terms thereof.

4. With the above observations, these writ petitions stand disposed of.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua 3rd November, 2026

Judge rohit

2 CWP No. 2056 of 2023 decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead