Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19591/2026 on 3 November 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 19343/2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CWP No. 19343/2026
Simer Kanchan & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
2. CWP No. 19450/2026
Hem Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
3. CWP No. 19309/2026
Pratap Singh & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
4. CWP No. 19460/2026
Vikram Sharma & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
5. CWP No. 19586/2026
Keshav Ram & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
6. CWP No. 19589/2026
Parbhat Kumar & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
7. CWP No. 19591/2026
Usha Kumari & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
8. CWP No. 19656/2026
Banita Kumari & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
9. CWP No. 19461/2026
Rajesh Kumar
…Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
10. CWP No. 19654/2026
Rajesh Sharma & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
11. CWP No. 19655/2026
Rajender Kumar & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents
12. CWP No. 19658/2026
Jai Krishan & Ors.
…Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: M/s Mandeep Chandel, Naresh K, Sharma, Gambir Singh, Yogesh Chandel Advocates, for the petitioners in the respective petitions.
For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the
Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No.4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025
petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner.
Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 03rd November, 2026(rohit)