Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19686/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP Nos. 19686/2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Purna Nand Sharma
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors.
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocates.
For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. Petitioner seeks regularization of his service by placing reliance upon Jaggo Vs. Union of India & Ors.2 It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation seeking redressal of the grievance raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation to the respondents/competent authority and that the
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 SLP© No. 5580/2024 decided on 20.12.2024 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:01:05 :::CIS
2 respondents/competent authority, in turn, be directed to decide the same within a time-bound schedule.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents/competent authority seeking redressal of the grievance raised in this writ petition. In case such a representation is made, the same shall be considered and decided within a reasonable time. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 3rd November, 2026
Judge rohit
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:01:05 :::CIS