Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19716/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 19716 of 2026
Decided on: 03.11.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chamel Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Raham Tulla, Advocate vice Mr.
Vishwa Bhushan Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.3.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, learned Counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents .
2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Taj Mohammad
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:01:20 :::CIS
2 and others Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others2 and Ajay Kumar Thakur and Ors Vs. State of HP and Anr 3. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition.
3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 3, 2026
Judge R.Atal
2 CWP No.2004 of 2017, decided alongwith connected matter on 03.08.2023. 3 CWPOA No. 1695 of 2019 decided on 04.10.2024 High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:01:20 :::CIS