Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1795/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:48534
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1795 of 2026
Date of decision: 03.11.2026. Chander Mohan
...Petitioner.
Versus
Devesh Kumar & others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioner has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the judgment dated 30.06.2026 [Annexure P-1], passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, in CWP No. 10078 of 2026, titled as Chander Mohan vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & another. The operative part of the judgment reads as under:- “2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes period of 12 weeks from today in terms of the contents therein.”
2. Basing reference to the orders dated 30.06.2026, [Annexure P-1], Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the Respondents have neither decided the representation nor any speaking order has been conveyed to the petitioner as yet.
3. Heard.
4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. As prayed by Learned Counsel for petitioner and considering the matter in above perspective, this Court disposes of the instant petition, with direction to Respondents/Competent Authority to decide the representation [Annexure P-2 in the said Writ Petition] within a period of six weeks from today [if not already decided].
6. Needless to say, that in case, the representation has already been decided, the decision on the representation/ speaking order be conveyed to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.
7. In aforesaid terms, the instant proceedings are closed and notice is discharged.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge November 03, 2026. (kck)