Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1797/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:48529
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1797 of 2026
Date of decision: 03.11.2026. Gopal Swaroop
...Petitioner.
Versus
Ashish Singhmar & another
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. HKS Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioner has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the judgment dated 05.05.2026 [Annexure P-1], passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, in CWP No. 1464 of 2026, titled as Gopal Swaroop vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & another. The operative part of the judgment reads as under:- “9. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of by quashing the rejection of the case of the petitioner on the ground of delay in terms of
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes documents which stand appended with the reply, with the direction to the employer to seek an option from the petitioner with regard to opting for the Old Pension Scheme within some reasonable time. In case, the petitioner exercises the option within the time granted, then, the Department may proceed with the same in terms of the option, otherwise, it may proceed in the matter in accordance with law.”
2. Basing reference to the orders dated 05.05.2026, [Annexure P-1], Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the Respondents have not complied with the judgment dated 05.05.2026, as yet.
3. Heard.
4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. As prayed by Learned Counsel for petitioner and considering the matter in above perspective, this Court disposes of the instant petition, with direction to Respondents/Competent Authority to comply with the orders dated 05.05.2026, [Annexure P-1], within a period of six weeks from today [if not already decided].
6. In aforesaid terms, the instant proceedings are closed and notice is discharged.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge November 03, 2026. (kck)