Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2586/2026 on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:48535
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2586 of 2026
Date of decision: 03.11.2026. Gurpreet Singh
...Petitioner.
Versus
Dr. Y.S. Parmar University
...Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Annieket Bhaik, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution/implementation of the order/judgment dated 26.05.2026 [Annexure E-1], passed in CWP No. 7838 of 2026, titled as Gurpreet Singh vs. Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:- “2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation (Annexure P-7) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of the contents therein.”
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:02:50 :::CIS
2. Heard.
3. Notice. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, waives service of notice on behalf of respondent.
4. At this stage, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, Respondents are directed to implement the order/judgment in a time bound manner. [Statement Taken On Record].
5. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned Counsel for the Respondent also.
6. Considering the matter in above perspective, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents- Competent Authority to implement the order/judgment within a period of six weeks from today.
7. In case, any grievance still remains, the petitioner may seek appropriate remedy, hereinafter, in accordance with law.
8. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition stands disposed of, alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge November 03, 2026. (kck) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:02:50 :::CIS