Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/19345/2026 on 2 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 19345 of 2026.
Decided on : 2
nd November, 2026
Ashok Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners.
Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.
Coram:
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for the respondents-State.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents- State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have preferred representation on 20.09.2026 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No. 3 seeking retrospective regularization with effect from 26.10.2020 along with consequential benefits on the analogy of office order dated 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-4). However, the aforesaid representation has not been considered and decided by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:04:32 :::CIS
2 respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 2nd November, 2026.
(jai)
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 04/11/2026 03:04:32 :::CIS