Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/4753/2019 on 2 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.4753 of 2019
Decided on: 02.11.2026 __________________________________________________________ Uma Azad
.....Petitioner
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Services ....Respondents Selection Board and others
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Ramesh Kumar Kaundal, Advocate.
For the respondents: None.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner had filed instant writ petition i.e. CWP No.7796 of before this Court; and upon establishment of State Administrative Tribunal, the matter was transferred to the said Tribunal; and now upon its abolition, the same has been re- transferred to this Court as CWPOA No.4753 of 2019, seeking the following relief:- “6 (i) That writ in the nature of certiorari may very kindly be issued, by quashing and setting aside the seniority lists dated
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
17.01.2003, 30.08.2004, 10.08.2009, 06.07.2011 and 09.05.2012, Annexures P-3, P-4, P-5, P-6 and P-7 respectively, being illegal and arbitrary; 7(ii) That writ in the nature of mandamus may very kindly be issued, directing the respondent No.1 to issue the correct seniority list in view of the Notification dated 06.08.2001, Annexure P-8; and 7(iii) That the respondent No.1 may kindly be directed to maintain the separate seniority list of the respondents No.2 and 3 or in the alternative, they may be asked to be shown below the petitioner in the seniority list, as they originally belong to the different grade in their present department.”
2. Pursuant to issuance of notice by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court on 08.09.2012, the parties have exchanged the pleadings inter-se.
3. Upon listing of the matter today, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on Instructions, fairly submits that petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings, hereinafter. [Statement Taken on Record].
4. Considering the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present proceedings are closed.
In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge November 02, 2026
[Bhardwaj]