Delhi High Court

ARB.P./1524/2026 of UNTHINKABLE SOLUTIONS LLP Vs ESSUMO TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED on 2 November 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

$~12

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010400272026

+

ARB.P. 1524/2026

UNTHINKABLE SOLUTIONS LLP

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh, Advs.

versus

ESSUMO TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Aditya Laroyia and Ms.

Somakshi Gupta, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

%

02.11.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.

2. Both parties are ad idem that the matter may be referred to arbitration.

3. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement2.

4. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.

1 “Act” hereinafter 2 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754

5. Therefore, in the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.

6. The Respondent is also not disputing the arbitration clause. He only submits that the Arbitrator has to be appointed by Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”).

7. Accordingly, DIAC is directed to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties within one week. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from the date of appointment by the DIAC.

8. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.

9. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of DIAC. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

10. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.

11. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11 of the Act.

The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

12. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J NOVEMBER 2, 2026/gunn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead