Delhi High Court

ARB.P./1141/2026 of RAKESH KUMAR BURREJA Vs SS ENTERPRISES & ANR. on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ARB.P. 1141/2026

$~5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010301982026

+

ARB.P. 1141/2026

RAKESH KUMAR BURREJA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Vijay singh and Mr. Shubh

Goyal, Advs.

versus

SS ENTERPRISES & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

%

30.10.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Service upon the Respondents is deemed sufficient in view of the affidavit of service, which records that substituted service was effected upon them by way of newspaper publication, in terms of the directions issued by this Court under Order V Rule 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The publication also notified the Respondents to appear before this Court, failing which the petition would be taken up for hearing. This Court had also granted an opportunity to the Respondents to file their reply to the present petition. However, no reply has been filed till date.

2. Despite substituted service having been duly effected and sufficient opportunity having been granted, none appears on behalf of the Respondents. The Respondents have also failed to file any reply to the present petition.

3. In view thereof and considering that the Respondents have chosen not to participate in the present proceedings, despite sufficient Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1141/2026

service, this Court finds no impediment in proceeding to consider the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.

4. The newspaper publications placed on record establishes that the Respondents have been duly served. The proof of service as reflected from the publication is annexed to the petition:- Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1141/2026

Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1141/2026

5. Maintenance Agreement contains an arbitration Clause under Clause 17, which is reproduced hereinbelow: “Arbitration: Excepting the cases of theft/pilferage of electric energy or interference with meter etc. (which are inter-alia offences) and only after the bill amount payable are paid to MAINTENANCE AGENCY. In the event of any differences or disputes arising between MAINTENANCE AGENCY and the SPACE BUYER in respect of any matter connected with the accuracy of bills, supply of services or interpretation of any of these terms and conditions which cannot be determined amicably, Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1141/2026

or settled through an agreement between MAINTENANCE AGENCY and the SPACE BUYER, the matter shall be referred to arbitration of Sole Arbitrator appointed by MAINTENANCE AGENCY. Reference to arbitration shall be without prejudice to the right of MAINTENANCE AGENCY to effect recovery of arrears of dues (through disconnection of supply or otherwise). The decision of Arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties. The arbitration proceedings shall be held at office of MAINTENANCE AGENCY and shall be in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or statutory modifications thereto. The Courts at New Delhi alone and/or High Court at Delhi alone shall have the jurisdiction in all matters of dispute arising out of or touching and or covering this transaction and arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in English language.”

6. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement.

8. In the present case, this Court is of the view that a valid and binding agreement exists between the parties.

9. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

10. Accordingly, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal (Advocate), Mob. No. 8889299671 is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within two weeks from today. Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1141/2026

11. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within two weeks of entering reference.

12. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

13. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, before the learned Sole Arbitrator including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction before the learned Sole Arbitrator, who shall consider the same in accordance with law.

14. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11 of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.

15. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.

1 “Act” hereinafter Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 1141/2026

16. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 30, 2026/at

Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:03.11.2026 11:52:04 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead