Delhi High Court
ARB.P./1661/2026 of MRS MITHLESH SHARMA Vs M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD 85 ANR on 28 October 2026
$~17
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010437722026
+
ARB.P. 1661/2026
MRS MITHLESH SHARMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Vishwendra Verma and
Ms. Shivali, Advs.
versus
M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD 85 ANR
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Aman Vasisth, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
JUDGMENT(ORAL)
%
28.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator.
2. Both parties are ad idem that the matter may be referred to the learned Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes.
3. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement2.
4. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties. Further the 1 “Act” hereinafter 2 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754
parties are also ad idem with respect to reference of disputes to arbitration. Therefore, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
5. The claimed amount is stated to be Rs.70 lakhs approx.
6. Accordingly, Ms. Charu Mathur, Advocate (Mob. No. 9868009602) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from today.
7. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.
8. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
9. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.
10. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.
11. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Ms. Charu Mathur, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.
12. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 28, 2026/gunn