Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
DEN RAJKOT CITY COMMUNICATION PVT LTD vs HIMATBHAI MOHANBHAI SOLANKI AND ORS on 28 October 2026
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
Dated:
28/10/2026
BROADCASTING PETITION/166/2018
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/182/2018
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/218/2018
MISC APPLICATION/182/2018
MISC APPLICATION/218/2018
Petitioner Name:
Den Rajkot City Communication Pvt Ltd
Versus
Respondent Name: Himatbhai Mohanbhai Solanki And Ors BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, MEMBER
For Applicants/Appellants/
Petitioners Advocate
Mr Vibhav SrivastavaMs Aashi AroraMs Disthi Yadav For Respondents Advocate Ms. Baishnovi Meher For R-1 Ms Karishma Singh & Ms Shreya Kardam For Mr Upender Thakur For R-2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Case taken up.
2. Counsel for Petitioner mentioned that affidavit had already been filed in compliance of order, dated 05.08.2026. But, the depreciated value is not there. The same is to be filed within a week.
3. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 mentioned that she request for discharge, because of the non-cooperation and non contact by Respondent No. 1, inspite of best efforts. A written notice has already been sent. The same is to be filed in the Court. Counsel for Respondent No. 2 is present.
4. As a notice for discharge has been given to Respondent No. 1, h ence, Respondent No. 1 will be at liberty to engage any other Counsel, if it desires so. Otherwise, exparte proceeding may take place against it.
5. List the matter on 06.01.2027 “for further hearing”.
( JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM)MEMBER
/NC/