Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

SHOPING BAZAR PVT LTD on 30 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated:

30/10/2026

MISC APPLICATION/302/2026

IN

BROADCASTING PETITION/102/2023

(MA DY.NO.771/2026)

[(MA DY.NO.771/2026) ]

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/300/2026

Petitioner Name:

Haur Cable Network

Versus

Respondent Name: Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd.

BEFORE

HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL, MEMBER

For Applicants/Appellants/

Petitioners Advocate

Mr. Himanshu DhawanMr. Abhay Dev Sharma

For Respondents Advocate

Mr. Kunal Tandon, Sr AdvMs. Aanchal TandonMr. Tarun MehtaMs. Niharika Sharma

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. MA (Dy. No.771/2026) in BP 102/2023:

This matter is taken up on being mentioned by learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the urgency of the matter because learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that they have filed MA (Dy. No.771/2026) in BP 102/2023 seeking some time to deposit the amount/Demand Draft, as the 3 weeks' notice period is coming to end on 29.10.2026. and the respondent may disconnect the signals on 30.10.2026.

2. Let the Registry assign a number to this MA.

3. Pursuant to this Tribunal’s order dated 28.10.2026 wherein the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs.10,00,000/- before the Registrar of this Tribunal by way of Demand Draft and on the condition of deposition of Rs.10,00,000/-, the operation, implementation and execution of the disconnection notice issued by the respondent dated 09.10.2026 (Annexure-A/1) was stayed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the MA preferred by the original petitioner (Dy.No.771/2026) wherein at para-2 of the affidavit the petitioner has submitted that they are undertaking to pay the entire amount of Rs.10,00,000/- on and before 06.11.2026 through Demand Draft. Further learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as the Demand Draft is to come from Midnapore, West Bengal, being a little remote area, it will take some time to reach the Demand draft to this Tribunal. Hence, they are seeking time to deposit the aforesaid amount of Rs.10,00,000/- on or before 06.11.2026 and requested for continuation of relief till 06.11.2026.

5. The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner to deposit the Demand Draft by 06.11.2026 is acceded to and accordingly petitioner is allowed to deposit the amount of Rs.10,00,000/- by way of Demand Draft on or before 06.11.2026 before the Registrar of this Tribunal, as directed vide order dated 28.10.2026.

6. Hence, this matter is adjourned on 06.11.2026.

( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER

/AS/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead