Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal
VIVEK MEHRA vs BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. on 27 October 2026
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI
Dated:
27/10/2026
TELECOM PETITION/36/2025
WITH
MISC APPLICATION/54/2026
Petitioner Name:
Vivek Mehra
Versus
Respondent Name: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
TELECOM PETITION/17/2026
Edip India
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (kolkata Circle)
....Respondent
TELECOM PETITION/23/2026
Rudra Telenet Solutions
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
....Respondent
TELECOM PETITION/24/2026
The Universal Press
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
....Respondent
TELECOM PETITION/25/2026
Tej Net Services
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
....Respondent
TELECOM PETITION/26/2026
Honey Computer Service
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
....Respondent
TELECOM PETITION/27/2026
Ramsa Media
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
....Respondent
TELECOM PETITION/37/2025WithMISC APPLICATION/55/2026
Manoj Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
....Respondent
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON
HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER
For Applicants/Appellants/
Petitioners Advocate
Mr. Himanshu Dhawan
For Respondents Advocate
Mr. Tejveer Singh Bhatia ( In All Matters Except T P 17/2026);Ms. Sangeeta Rai, Mr. Harish Saini( In T P.17/2026)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. We have heard learned counsels appearing for both sides at length.
2 . Learned counsels appearing for respondents have raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the present Telecom Petition mainly for the reason that petitioners are not at all service providers. At the highest petitioners are franchisee. Moreover, there is also an arbitration clause in the agreement between the petitioners and the respondent. Several such types of other preliminary objections have been raised by the learned counsels for the respondent.
3. Registry is hereby directed to enlist these matters under the heading "For Hearing" on 26.11.2026.
4. These matters will be heard along with TP 36/2025.
5. Earlier the stay granted in by this Tribunal as well as by Hon'ble Delhi High Court shall stand continued to be operative, during the pendency and final hearing of these Telecom Petitions.
( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON
( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER
/AS/