Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

M/S VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED vs SRI DUNICHAND KHITRI RAJA AND ORS. on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

NEW DELHI

Dated:

15/10/2026

CYBER APPEAL/16/2025

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/718/2025

WITH

MISC APPLICATION/719/2025

Appellant Name:

M/s Vodafone Idea Limited

Versus

Respondent Name: Sri Dunichand Khitri Raja And Ors.

BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRUBHAI NARANBHAI PATEL, CHAIRPERSON

HON'BLE DR. SANJEEV BANZAL ,MEMBER

For Applicants/Appellants/

Petitioners Advocate

Ms. Swati Mittal

For Respondents Advocate

Mr. Saket GogiaMr. Man Singh For R1;Mr. Vikrant Kumar R2;Mr. Anand Shankar JhaMr. Sachin Mintri For R3.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

. MA.718/2025: This Miscellaneous Application has been preferred by the original appellant seeking exemption from supplying the typed copies of certain Annexures etc. annexed with the memo of this Cyber Appeal.

. Having heard the learned counsels for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, we hereby allow this MA, subject to, the condition that whenever any of the counsels on behalf of the appellant or the respondents to this Cyber Appeal is reading any of the Annexures of this Cyber Appeal, the same must be legible and, if not , neatly typed copies of the same shall be supplied by the appellant. On this condition, this M.A. is hereby allowed and disposed of.

3. MA.719/2025 - This M.A. has been preferred by the applicant (original appellant) and looking to the fact that now respondent nos.2 & 3 are appearing, learned counsel for the applicant submits that this MA is not pressed at this stage.

. In view of the aforesaid submission, this MA is hereby disposed of as not pressed at this stage.

. CA.16/2025 : Learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2 are seeking time to file reply.

. Learned counsel for respondent no.3 submitted that they have already filed their reply, copy whereof has been supplied to the learned counsel for the appellant.

. Learned counsel for the appellant is seeking permission to file rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent no.3 during course of the day, which shall be accepted by the Registry.

. In view of the these submissions, the time, as prayed for, is granted to the appellant as well as to the respondent nos.1 and 2.

9. These matter is, therefore, adjourned on 12.01.2027.

. This Cyber Appeal will be heard along with CA.14/2025 and CA.1/2026.

( JUSTICE D. N. PATEL)CHAIRPERSON

( DR. SANJEEV BANZAL)MEMBER

/DBC/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead