KRISHNA ESTATE THROUGH PROPERITOR SANJEEV DIWEKAR vs PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD AND 2 ORS on 3 November 2026

Sr. No. 15 FARAD DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL . MUMBAI MISC APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2026 Date 03.11.2026 ROZNAMA Next Date Advocate Utsav Atha present for the Appellant. Advocate Drumi Nisar present for R-l. None for the other Respondents. Steps have not been carried out and also original postal receipt have not been submitted by the Advocate for the Appellant. Advocate for the Appellant submitted that the copy of the reply had not been received and that another proceeding had been received through email. However, the Advocate appearing for R-l showed the relevant email on his mobile phone and also opened the attachment therein before the Court, thereby demonstrating that the copy of the reply had indeed been served upon the Appellant through email. The conduct of the Advocate for the Appellant in making such submissions, despite the proof of service being demonstrated before the Court, is deprecated. Such practice is highly undesirable. Letthe matter be listed before the Hon'ble Chairperson for appropriate orders. (Prabhupada Panda) Registrar DRAT. Mumbai 18.12.2026