Central Administrative Tribunal
Pahare Rameshwar SukhA Deo vs M/O DEFENCE on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 9 O.A./130/2026 (BANGALORE) [ TRANSFER ] Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: 8 Order Dated: 03/11/2026 PAHARE RAMESHWAR SUKHA DEO Vs M/O DEFENCE
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri B S Venkatesh Kumar represents Shri P. Kamalesan For Respondent(s) Advocate : Shri H R Sreedhara Order of The Tribunal When the matter was called in the first round, none appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the matter was passed over. In the secound round, the proxy counsel Shri B S Venkatesh Kumar on behalf of the arguing counsel Shri P. Kamalesan for the applicant informs that the arguing counsel Shri P. Kamalesan has met with an accident and thus, he is unable to appear before the court. Shri H R Sreedhara on behalf of the respondents. 10 days time is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents to file an additional reply along with an MA, if any. In case the same is not filed, the pleadings will be considered to be completed. List the case on 30.11.2026.
SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A)
Chhaya Verma ( steno 'd' )