Central Administrative Tribunal
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) vs SHASHI KUMAR on 3 November 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE Order Sheet Item no.: 8 M.A./399/2026 (BANGALORE) [ DELETION OF PARTICULAR RESPONDENTS ] In O.A./150/2026 TRANSFER Court No.: 2 No of Adjournment: Order Dated: 03/11/2026 EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO) Vs SHASHI KUMAR
For Applicant(s) Advocate : Shri Mahesh L - through video conference For Respondent(s) Advocate : Ms. Vimala C Order of The Tribunal
Ms. Vimala C on behalf of the Original Respondents/Applicant in MA. Shri Mahesh L on behalf of the Original Applicant/Respondents in MA, through video conference. Heard on MA No. 399/2026 regarding the deletion of the Respondent No. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has no objection to the deletion of respondent no.1 from the OA, subject to adherence and compliance to what the counsel for the respondents has mentioned in Para 11 of the MA itself. The relevant extracts of Para 11 as follows: "11. The Respondent No.4, EPFO, Bengaluru Zone is coordinating with Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 5 at Head Office, New Delhi for defending the present Original Application before this Hon'ble Tribunal at Bengaluru. The Respondent No. 4 is providing all assistance, records and para-wise comments to the Head Office and will produce any original records as and when directed. The detailed counter affidavit on merits will be filed by the main contesting Respondents i.e., repetition and conflicting stands." The counsel for the respondents agrees to the same and also invites my attention to the Annexure MA-1 regarding the delegation of powers to the Law Officers. In view of the above, MA No. 399/2026 is allowed and Respondent No. 1 is deleted from the array of respondents, Causetitle to be amended accordingly. As per the previous order sheet dated 22.10.2026, the learned counsel for the respondents was given 10 days time to file the additional reply and also to furnish the relevant notings/proceedings pertaining to the transfer of the applicant. The learned counsel for the respondents requests for another two weeks' time to furnish the above documents. On consideration, time is granted. List the case again on 01.12.2026.
SANTOSH MEHRA Member (A) Chhaya Verma ( steno 'd' )