Central Administrative Tribunal

HUKMI CHAND vs M/o Defence on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR Order Sheet Item no.: 20 O.A./19/2020 (JODHPUR) [ COMPULSORY RETIREMENT ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 29 Order Dated: 02/11/2026 HUKMI CHAND Vs M/O DEFENCE

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr Mahendra Singh Godara, Advocate, present for the applicant For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr K.S.Yadav, for respondents Order of The Tribunal Arguments heard to some extent. The Counsel for applicant, during the course of arguments, submits that he does not want to press the relief as prayed in "Para 8(ii) of the reliefs". However, he is entitled for the salary for the period from 04.03.2016 to 23.12.2017, as mentioned in his O.A. under para 8(iii) of the reliefs. On this point, learned Counsel for the respondents, Mr. K.S.Yadav, seeks some time to go through the record(s). List the matter on 27.11.2026 under 'Part-heard' category. HUKUM SINGH MEENA Member (A) Rameshwar Vyas Member (J) Jitendra Mehta ( pps )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead