Central Administrative Tribunal

Ajay Kumar Singh vs TELECOMMUNICATION on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 18 O.A./568/2026 (RANCHI) [ PENSIONARY BENEFITS ] [ SENIOR CITIZEN ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 1 Order Dated: 02/11/2026 AJAY KUMAR SINGH Vs TELECOMMUNICATION

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Rishikesh giri For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Pravin Kumar Pandey, ASC for resp. no. 1, Mr. Sumit Prakash for resp. no. 2 & 3 Order of The Tribunal Learned Counsel for the parties are present and heard. This case is fixed for filing of written statement, which has not yet been filed. Counsel for the Opposite Party seeks another opportunity of four weeks to file his written statement. Counsel for the applicant has not opposed such prayer. As prayed for, Counsel for the Opposite Party is granted a final opportunity of four weeks to file his written statement. List this case on 09.12.2026.

KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Sonali Lal ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead