Central Administrative Tribunal

UMESH KUMAR JAYASWAL vs CGST on 2 November 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PATNA Order Sheet Item no.: 34 O.A./109/2023 (RANCHI) [ PAY SCALES ] Court No.: 1 No of Adjournment: 23 Order Dated: 02/11/2026 UMESH KUMAR JAYASWAL Vs CGST

For Applicant(s) Advocate : Mr. Abhay Prakash For Respondent(s) Advocate : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sahu, v/c mode Order of The Tribunal Learned counsel for the parties are present. Counsel for the opposite parties, appearing through video- conferencing mode, submits that he is presently out of station and, therefore, seeks an adjournment of the matter. Counsel for the applicant has no objection to the prayer. In view of the above submission, the prayer for adjournment is allowed. List this case on 07.12.2026. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA Member (A) Justice Narendra Kumar Johari Member (J) Sonali Lal ( court master )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead