Central Administrative Tribunal
Ganesh Narayan Kumhar vs CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS on 2 November 2026
1 OA No. 829/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Mumbai Bench, Mumbai
Original Application No. 829/2026
Dated this Monday, the 02nd day of November, 2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Ganesh Narayan Kumhar
Aged 37 years, Occ: Appraiser in Customs R/at Flat No. 302, 'A' wing, Plot No. 84
Sector 5, Ulwe, Dist. Raigarh - 410206
Email: ibgnkumhar@gmail.com
...Applicant
(By Adv: Ms. Amina Momin)
Versus
1. The Union of India,
Through Secretary,
Revenue Department, Ministry of Finance, Office at Kartavya Bhawan-I, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi - 110 001
2. The Chief Commissioner of Customs,
JNCH, Nhava Sheva, Customs Zone- II,
Office of the Chief Commissioner of
Post. Sheva, Tal. Uran, Dist. Raigad- 400 702.
…Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant seeking directions to the Appellate Authority i.e.
Phone=
Rashmi I am the author of this document Rashmi
2 OA No. 829/2026
respondent no. 2 for deciding his statutory appeal dated 24.11.2025, which is pending before the Appellate Authority.
2. It is the case of the applicant that the Commissioner of Customs (G) has passed punishment order dated 15.10.2025 by imposing penalty of reduction of pay by two stages for a period of two years w.e.f. the date of issuance of the order, against which statutory appeal was preferred.
2.1 It is further submitted that vide communication dated 24.08.2026 (Annexure-A-2) applicant again prayed before the Appellate Authority for consideration of his pending appeal and providing an opportunity of personal hearing. However, till date no communication has been received by the applicant either in respect of the disposal of appeal or providing an opportunity of personal hearing, as prayed by the applicant.
3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the applicant, since limited prayer for consideration of his pending appeal as sought by the learned counsel for the applicant and therefore, present original application is disposed of with directions to
Phone=
Rashmi I am the author of this document Rashmi
3 OA No. 829/2026
the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the pending appeal dated 24.11.2025 (Annexure-A-1), if not decided, within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the same shall be communicated to the applicant, as per rules.
4. With the aforesaid, the OA is disposed of at Admission stage without issuing notices to the respondents.
5. Pending MAs, if any, shall stand disposed of. No order as to cost.
(Umesh Gajankush) Member (J)
R.
Phone=
Rashmi I am the author of this document Rashmi