Central Administrative Tribunal
Sandeep Baban Talekar vs DEFENCE on 2 November 2026
1 OA No. 808/2026
Central Administrative Tribunal
Mumbai Bench, Mumbai
Original Application No. 808/2026
Dated this Monday, the 02nd day of November, 2026
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Umesh Gajankush, Member (J)
Sandeep Baban Talekar,
Age 53 years, working as UDC,
Naval Armament Depot, Karanja,
Uran, Navi Mumbai, R/at: Plot No. 411,
Chintan Apartment, Room No. 602,
Takka Road, Behind Bharat Petrol Pump,
Panvel - 410 206.
Mob. - 9920425869
Email: talekarsandeep35@gmail.com
...Applicant
(By Adv: Shri V A Nagrani)
Versus
1. Union of India,
Through the Chief of Naval Staff
Integrated Headquarters,
Ministry of Defence (N),
New Delhi - 110 011.
2. Chief of Naval Staff
Naval Headquarters,
Ministry of Defence (N),
New Delhi 110 011.
3. Flag Officer Commanding-In-Chief
Headquarters,
Western Naval Command,
Ballard Estate, Tiger Gate,
Naval Dockyard, Mumbai-400 001
Phone=
Rashmi
Rashmi
2 OA No. 808/2026
4. Chief General Manager,
Naval Armament Depot,
Naval Dock Yard, Gun Gate,
Mumbai- 400 023.
…Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present original application has been filed by the applicant raising a grievance of inaction on the part of the Competent Authority for not considering his representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure-A-6).
2. It is the case of the applicant that he has been illegally and arbitrarily transferred from NAD Trombay to NAD Karanja on the ground of his own request transfer, whereas, it is the case of the applicant that he has not made any request for transferring him from NAD Trombay to NAD Karanja. Even otherwise, on the transferred place, he has joined i.e. NAD Karanja and completed tenure of 3 years and therefore, his request is that now after completion of period of 3 years, he may be permitted to take back/transfer to NAD Trombay.
2.1 It is submitted that in respect of representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure-A-6) till date, he has not received any communication from the Competent Authority
Phone=
Rashmi Rashmi
3 OA No. 808/2026
and therefore, limited prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant that the Competent Authority of the respondents may be directed to consider the pending representation of the applicant, as per rules, and pass appropriate order.
3. After hearing learned counsel for the applicant on a limited issue, this present original application is disposed of with directions to the Competent Authority of the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure-A-6), if already not decided, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.
4. Applicant is directed to submit a copy of representation dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure-A-6) additionally along with the order passed today.
5. Since the OA is disposed of at Admission stage and therefore, it was thought not necessary to issue notices to the respondents.
6. Needless to mention, this Tribunal has not considered the merits and de-merits of the case.
Phone=
Rashmi Rashmi
4 OA No. 808/2026
7. With the aforesaid, the OA is disposed of. Pending MAs, if any, shall stand disposed of. No order as to cost
(Umesh Gajankush) Member (J)
R.
e43eb0e1e71d4e88b0ea71809694b4a7, Phone=
Rashmi Rashmi